Until this year, I lived almost all of my life in one or other district of London, starting in Bermondsey and Rotherhithe, which were then working class districts of South-East London. Then there was a gap, when my Dad moved us to Bexley, which was then in Kent but is now a London Borough. I later moved back to Clapham, then to Wandsworth, when I married. Going up in the World, so we believed, we moved the short distance to Wimbledon, where I stayed until 1985, when I moved back to Rotherhithe, specifically the part known as Surrey Docks. This was no longer just a working class district, as the regeneration of Docklands had radically changed both the area, and the people that lived there. After many years there, I eventually found myself in Camden Town, the now fashionable area just North of London’s West End, where I stayed for 12 years, until moving to Norfolk. So, I had lived in South East, South West, and North London, missing out only the extremes of the East and West at either end.
For those of you who do not know London, it must be said that it is a vast place. From Barnet in the North, to Croydon in the South, is a road distance of almost 24 miles, and from Dagenham in the East, to Hounslow in the West, nearly 30 miles. This is an area of 720 miles, all heavily built-up, with an incredibly dense population, and severe traffic problems. That population is very diverse, with inhabitants from almost every country in the World, speaking hundreds of different languages, and bringing their own cultures to the areas where they have chosen to settle. Yet Londoners are also strangers in their own, forbidding city. Many rarely leave the areas in which they live, except to commute to work, or seek entertainment.
Crossing the Thames from one side to the other is usually done underground, on the vast tube network, as using a car in the central area is a waste of time, and parking is at a premium, day or night. Most buses run the full 24 hours, and can be a good way of getting around, providing you know in which direction to take one in the first place. Only tourists sit in the front seats upstairs though, it just isn’t cool. And you don’t talk to anyone, unless you have to, it just isn’t done. No point asking directions anyway, as chances are the person you ask will either not speak English, or be as lost as you are.
It is just too big. As a result, Londoners have learned to live in the districts, turning them into small villages inside the Metropolis, each with a unique character. Street markets still thrive, though it is doubtful you would ever see them, as only the locals would know where they are. I am not referring to Camden Market, or Petticoat Lane, as these are on the tourist trail; I mean the old London markets, such as East Street, Roman Road, and Chapel street, where crowds still flock to do ‘normal’ shopping.
The original London, The City, is a place all to itself. Housing the financial district, St Paul’s cathedral, and The Barbican, it is self-governing, self-policing, and packed full of fascinating history at every turn. Teeming with workers during the day, it becomes almost uninhabited after dark, and at weekends, and eerily quiet, except for the small area in and around Smithfield meat market. Names you may have heard but that meant nothing to you, like Tottenham, Fulham, or Hendon, are in fact areas that are busier than most large towns in Britain, with a population to equal those too. Some Londoners live all of their lives in one or other of these areas, without ever feeling the need to travel around, or to move house; some because they have no choice, others from preference. There are districts associated with rich people, and expensive houses, like Chelsea, Kensington, or Hampstead. In reality, they are home to large numbers of ordinary working people also, and many were formerly the poorest areas of the Capital.
The River Thames is more than a river flowing through a major city. It defines your part in London Life. Whether you live North or South of it, what bridge or tunnel you use to cross it, views from bridges or embankments from one side or the other, and the iconic buildings and areas lining its banks, the Thames is everything to London. The former docks and wharves that were once the lifeblood of the Capital, providing its very reason for existence, and employment for a large part of the population, are now long gone. They have been replaced with pleasant walkways and open spaces, such as The South Bank, or attractive riverside dwellings, out of the financial reach of most of the inhabitants. It is cleaner, and the views along the river are better as a result, though I am not convinced it is really an improvement. Riverboats still ply their trade up and down the Thames, but these days, they are for tourism and entertainment only, as the few commercial ships that you see will be taking London’s rubbish to be dumped somewhere.
The once bustling pubs with river frontages, are now offering nouvelle cuisine, and welcoming coach parties of Japanese tourists, to enjoy a taste of ‘Real London’. Still, there are now cormorants fishing off the piers, and fish such as salmon have found their way back to the shadow of Tower Bridge, so that is something to be thankful for, I suppose. And there are the bridges. They are mostly spectacular, and something that I genuinely miss. London at night is enhanced by its bridges. There is the simply unequalled Tower Bridge, which still occasionally rises, to let large vessels pass, and the great concrete slab of Waterloo Bridge, which has always afforded the best view of London from anywhere in the centre. Further West, the bridges of Albert, Battersea, and Chelsea, illuminated by hundreds of lights, give a fairground appearance to their surroundings. If you ever visit London, make sure to take the long walk along the embankment from East to West, as the dozen or more bridges you will see on your way (there are more of course, but you will not walk that far) will tell you as much about London as anything else you may discover.
Religion is well catered for, though many of the ‘ordinary’ Londoners are far from religious beings. There are numerous Synagogues, catering for the large Jewish population, of almost 200,000. More recently, Mosques have appeared all over the City, including the grand and imposing main London Mosque, just inside Regent’s Park. There are Protestant and Catholic churches in abundance, including large cathedrals, as well as smaller churches of every denomination you could think of. The Hindu Temple in Neasden is worth the long trip North-West, as the building is stunning, and all are welcome there. There are places of worship for Hare Krishna devotees, Quakers, Mormons, and of course, Jehovah Witnesses. Alternative religions are well catered for too, and you will find the offices of Scientologists, Christadelphians, and even the Secular Society, for agnostics. For a City that seems to have put religion aside, it is exceptionally well served, nonetheless.
For most visitors to London, whether foreign tourists, or Britons attending a sporting event, or going to see a show, it is only the centre that they experience. The Theatre District, Chinatown, Soho, Oxford Street, or the large parks. For Londoners, these are communities too. Only yards away from the strip clubs and gay bars of Soho, lives a community that has existed for centuries. Social housing, deprived conditions, drug and alcohol abuse, and unemployment, all cheek-by-jowl with wine bars, night clubs, and theatres showing the latest big musical. You only have to listen to the constant sirens, or attend a hospital A&E department, to realise that something other than entertainment and shopping is really going on all around you.
You cannot ever hope to understand London unless you live there. You don’t have to actually be a Londoner, as I am. In fact, a minority of the inhabitants of London actually originate from there. It is a magnet for the whole country, as well as the World outside the U.K. There are as many Irish people there as can be found in Dublin, and Scottish accents are as familiar to Londoners as cockney ones. It could be argued that ‘real’ locals are dying out, as they move to the suburbs, escaping unaffordable housing, or just trying to get away from the hustle and bustle. But London has always had a diverse population, since the Romans first bridged the Thames, so it is more accurate to realise that there is no such thing as a ‘true’ Londoner; residence is the only qualification.
This is the City of my youth, my middle age, and the very thing that defines me. Though I no longer live there, I have no doubt that I will always be perceived to be, and to feel inside, a Londoner.
I lived in Wandsworth borough (apart from a year in Wimbledon) for twelve years. I had friends who grew up in North London who had NEVER been south of the river until they met me and came to my house. They were amazed to find it was not a complete wasteland.
LikeLiked by 1 person
That North/South divide never seems to change. π
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLike
I loved this post-My very favorite post, never had too many read.Even when I reblogged it! o well-this is a great read on London . . .best always, Michele
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks as always for your kind words, Michele. I am very happy that you enjoyed it.
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLike
I enjoyed this. I was last in London in 1974, a much different city then I can guess.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, as you will see from Part 2 of this old post, Elizabeth.
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person
London is one of my favorite cities, Pete. Many, many years ago, our headquarters was in Windsor, along Thames River. My colleagues and I shared an apartment in Berkeley. We never miss London every time weβre in the country!
LikeLiked by 1 person
It is a great city, Wilma. Always something to see and enjoy. π
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLike
What a lovely post. London has always been my home.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks, Alex. London was my home for 60 years, and it has taken me a long time to get used to living in Beetley. π
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person
For the past decade, my world has been defined by areas of Nevada, Arizona, Utah, and California. So it’s very interesting to read about places like London, a city I’m unlikely to ever have an opportunity to visit. It’s been 24 years since I’ve stood on European soil, and I don’t see any trips there in the foreseeable future.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks, David. You spent a lot of time in Paris, so I expect you would enjoy London too.
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I love how London has evolved over time to become the cosmopolitan city it is now. Every time I have visited, I have always felt very comfortable there. (This from a Canadian farm girl.)
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks, Darlene. Happy to hear that you enjoyed your trips to my home city.
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Reblogged this on Stevie Turner and commented:
Great post from a fellow Londoner. Whenever I go up to Westminster and walk along the Embankment, I want to cry, especially when Big Ben chimes. The East End where I grew up has changed beyond belief. I don’t go back there very often, as I’d rather keep the memories of what used to be inside my head and pretend it’s still the same.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ah, Roman Road market! I spent the formative years of my life walking ‘down The Roman’. I would bump into numerous relatives on Saturdays all doing their shopping, but alas they’re all dead now. They were happy days. Don’t want to go back too often though – it’s all changed too much. I’m going to East London tomorrow to lay some flowers on my mum and grandmothers’ grave, but I won’t stop to see where I used to live. It’s all too depressing.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks, Stevie. I was a regular along Roman Road for work purposes, at one time. But my heart was South of the River of course. π
Many thanks for the reblog. I left a comment on your blog, but didn’t see it appear.
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person
We moved South of the river in my teenage years, then to Wandsworth and then Croydon when I got married. I love my London, but it’s not mine anymore.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Look out for Part 2 of this old post tomorrow. π
LikeLiked by 1 person
We’re out for most of the day tomorrow, but I’ll check in tomorrow evening.
LikeLiked by 1 person
A lovely post Pete explaining the diversity of that huge city. It is such a shame that the country is so Londoncentric though I am happy that dear old York, which to me should be the capital city, isn’t. I’d hate it to become such a sprawling monster.
LikeLiked by 1 person
York is indeed best left alone, Jude. Of course, Winchester was the old Anglo-Saxon capital, but that would have been ruined too. π
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ah, yes. Winchester is a lovely city. No, wouldn’t want to ruin that one either.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Itβs like a country within a country!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Funny you should say that Kim. When they were discussing devolution for Wales and Scotland, I said “What about London?” π
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I once had a Londoner ask me for train route information at Wilmslow. I happened to have a map with me, which I gave him. I was so flattered.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Londoners don’t often venture as far as Cheshire, Edith. π
Thanks for helping him out!
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Nice post, Pete!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks, Jennie. One from the ‘early archives’. π
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Keep βem cominβ! π
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for reblogging it. Warmest regards, Theo
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m looking back over these ‘almost unseen’ posts, Theo. More to come, I expect.
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on beetleypete and commented:
Another neglected old post, from 2012. I have since written a fair bit about London, but this was my first attempt on this blog.
LikeLike