Just been watching…(18)

Locke (2013)

***Some unavoidable spoilers that are all revealed very soon in the film anyway***

Here’s an unusual idea. A film starring one person, filmed entirely in a car as he drives along a motorway to London. The only other cast members are just voices, heard over his mobile phone in the car. Not completely new, of course. Before this, we have had other films starring one person, the most recent of which I can recall was ‘Buried’, in 2010. In that film, Ryan Reynolds plays a man buried alive in a war zone, with the only other characters heard over a phone too.

With ‘Locke’, we have the redoubtable Tom Hardy as the only visible character, Ivan Locke. He is driving his car from some unnamed place, to visit a woman in London who is about to give birth to his baby. He spends the entire film talking to work colleagues about concrete, or to his wife about how their life is unravelling. He also occasionally talks to the woman having his baby, or her doctors and nurses. When he is not on the ‘phone, he is talking to his father; but as this is only in his imagination, we do not see that character either.

So to sum up, we have a lead character who is obsessed with his job, and the pouring of concrete into the building site where he is the manager. He has to try to calm down the woman who is having his baby, someone he hardly knows and has slept with just the once. He has the unenviable task of telling his wife this news over the telephone, whilst trying to act normally with both his young sons, who expect him home to watch a big football match on TV. In the middle of all this, he is also trying to motivate one of his employees to step up and oversee the pouring of the concrete the next morning. All this, as he drives his car down a busy motorway late in the evening.

For most sensible film fans this would be enough to make them lose interest already. Many of us might well have already stopped reading this review, and decided never to bother with the film. However, I have some startling news for you. It is actually very good. It works, and it works well, even though it shouldn’t. There are quite a few reasons why it works so well. For one thing, it is shot in real time. This is not only apparent, but adds to the overall sense of reality that pervades the film. Then there are the actors who voice the other parts. They are all excellent, and completely convincing. Given that these include Olivia Colman, Tom Holland, and Ruth Wilson, that comes as no surprise.

Most of all, the spellbinding Tom Hardy is very capable of holding the film together. He has a cold, he wants the concrete to get poured, and he knows that his marriage has been badly affected. Yet he is determined to do the decent thing by the woman having his baby. He refuses to repeat the mistakes made by his own father, whatever the cost to his life, which he seems to be juggling like spinning plates for most of this film. Not many films surprise me, but this one did.

And for some reason, Hardy also does it all in a Welsh accent.

(In case you were wondering about road safety, the scenes in the car were filmed as it was towed along on a trailer.)

16 thoughts on “Just been watching…(18)

    1. A very ‘British’ film experience, Cindy. I think it will translate very nicely though.
      (This is what happens when I write a lot more about films, as you requested. Suddenly, you need more time to watch them…)
      Best wishes, Pete.


  1. Pete, I watched this film this morning and found myself really enjoying it. This direction gives you such a small window of distractions that you can really get into what this film is all about and how many lives are actually affected. Great find my friend and thumbs up…

    Take care and enjoy your Sunday, from Laura


    1. I am so pleased that you watched it on my recommendation, Laura. Also doubly pleased that you enjoyed it too. You are right about ‘the small window of distractions’. He has to take the script, and make the best of it. And he does just that.
      Best wishes, Pete.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. Tom Hardy has delivered a number of fascinating performances in his career, and this is one I will look out for…wish they had given him some dialogue in “Fury Road” – the “silent anti-hero” thing kept him over-shadowed by Charlize Theron, who was terrific in film but it was, after all, supposed to be his movie


    1. Thanks, John. I haven’t yet seen ‘Fury Road’. It falls into my personal category of ‘Pointless remakes’. When it is on TV, I might watch it…
      In this film, he has nothing but dialogue, albeit in a Welsh accent!
      Best wishes, Pete.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. I haven’t seen “Fury Road,” but it’s been listed in the top 100 films of this century, and RottenTomatoes rates it 97%. So it has to be pretty darn good. I’ve never seen the old Mad Max films, so I’ll have to check it out one of these days.


        1. I have seen the first three ‘Mad Max’ films, David. The first one was something different at the time, then the other two were more of the same, but less interesting. That’s why my desire to see ‘Fury Road’ is less than frantic.
          Regards, Pete.


    1. It’s very different, Sue. No sex or violence, and a very British feel throughout. An idea that shouldn’t have worked, but did. It is on Film 4 on TV occasionally, which I where I recorded it from.
      Best wishes, Pete.

      Liked by 1 person

All comments welcome

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.