Today’s choice is a rare example of a remake that is so much better than the original, it leaves me recommending the modern version as the only one to watch. In 1958, Hollywood filmed the Graham Greene novel ‘The Quiet American’, starring Audie Murphy and Michael Redgrave. Neither stars were the first choices, or even the second, and despite some filming taking place in Vietnam (where the story is set) much of it was shot in Italy instead.
If you don’t know the story, it is set in 1952, during the revolt against French rule in the country. A young American (Murphy) has arrived to work for an aid organisation, though he may secretly be a CIA spy, checking out the country for later US involvement in the region. He meets a distinguished British journalist (Redgrave) and falls for the older man’s beautiful Vietnamese girlfriend, taking her away from his friend. As a result, the journalist exposes America’s shady dealings of supporting the anti-communists in the country, and giving them arms.
The film outraged Graham Greene by changing the political emphasis, and making it appear that America was doing the ‘right thing’. And despite a classically understated and powerful performance from the distinguished Redgrave, Audie Murphy was woefully miscast in his role.
Then in 2002, another version was made, by Philip Noyce. This starred Michael Caine and Brendan Fraser, with Caine as the journalist, and Fraser in the role played by Audie Murphy in the earlier film. By this time of course, we had seen the French defeated in Vietnam, and the long war that followed against the US and their South Vietnamese allies. Most people had some idea of the background, and the events that led up to it, shown in Greene’s novel, and the earlier film.
But crucially, the modern film stuck to Greene’s original story, and ending. The often clumsy Fraser stepped up to portray the American so well, and Michael Caine gave one of his best performances as the world-weary journalist, which earned him three nominations for Best Actor. The whole film was shot in Vietnam, with locations including Hanoi and Saigon. This was the film that should have been made in 1958, if it hadn’t been for casting errors, and the dark shadow of the McCarthy witch-hunts. If you have never seen it, I really recommend you do.
Great post π I love both versions, but I can understand why Graham Greene hated the 1958 version. Anyway, keep up the great work as always π
LikeLiked by 1 person
I liked Redgrave in the original, but though Murphy wasn’t up to such roles to be honest. π
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Michael Caine is always someone (almost) never disappoints (well…letβs not talk about Jaws the Revenge ππ). But this was a great film. I haven’t seen the original, but I always trust your judgement on these matters so I will take your word on it. It was also nice to see a totally different role from Brendan Fraser (who has pretty much disappeared into thin air these days it seems).
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks, Michel. Caine often took roles in poor films just for the money, and was unapologetic about that. Fraser was someone I didn’t care for at all, but their combination in this film worked well, as the original pairing of Murphy and Redgrave felt awkward, and unconvincing.
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I have read the book (long time ago so might revisit) but haven’t seen either film. I’ll not bother with the original in view of what you say.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks, Mary. The original changed the emphasis from Greene’s intention to show the Americans as responsible for many of the problems following the French defeat. It focused on America ‘defeating Communism’ in the region instead. It was 1958 of course, and most Americans were worried about ‘Reds under the bed’. π
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Interesting to see how views have changed since the McCarthy era.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well we had the Vietnam War to thank for that change in attitude of course. π
LikeLike
Thank you, Pete. Well said, and good to know.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks, Jennie. I hope you get to see the 2002 version, if you haven’t already.
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Definitely. Best to you, Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I didn’t even know about the remake. Thanks.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s much better, Elizabeth. Often on TV here too, so you may be able to see it.
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks. I like the adaptation of “End of the Affair.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
Having seen the original, I chose not to see the remake as I thought the original was a waste of film stock. Given your review, I will watch it when I get the chance.
Warmest Regards, Theo
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks, Theo. the new version was much better, and stuck to the story.
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLike
Yay! I love Michael Caine and Brendan Fraser in the remake. I haven’t seen the original and admire Mr. Audie, but I’ll skip it. I was thinking a bit ago about revisiting this remake so it’s nice to see you featuring it here today. Great post!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks, Cindy. Glad you agree the modern version is good.
Best wishes, Pete. x
LikeLiked by 1 person
Iβve only seen the 2002 version but I really enjoyed it.βΊοΈ
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pleased to hear that, Kim. It’s the best of the two.
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I like the modern version better. Fraser and Caine really fit the bill.
LikeLiked by 1 person
They do indeed, Ron.
Thanks very much for your comment.
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLike
I have seen this movie and it is really well done. Top notch! Now if you are doing Michael Caine re-makes will you be doing The Italian Job?
LikeLiked by 2 people
Maybe. π π
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLike
I’m familiar with the title, but, to be honest, knew nothing about the film (either version). Thanks for the heads-up.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The 2002 film is well worth watching, David.
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Iβve not seen either. Thanks to your excellent review iβll skip the first.
LikeLiked by 1 person
That’s a good decision, but when you get the chance, I don’t think you will be disappointed with the 2002 film.
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person
You are so good at locating those film versions. This seems like a good one.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The modern remake is really excellent, Arlene.
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I like the sound of this one, cheers!
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s a first class drama, Eddy, and Caine is on top form.
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person
This is good to hear, Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person
If you haven’t seen the 2002 film, GP, it’s an excellent drama.
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person