The Girl On The Train (2016)
***No spoilers***
I haven’t read the best-selling novel that this film is based on, so cannot comment on whether or not it is a good adaptation. Despite being nominated for a BAFTA film award, the film received mixed reviews on release, most of which I avoided reading, so I would not see any spoilers. I waited until it was shown on TV to watch it, as is it not one of those films you need to see on a big screen.
The story is set in America, in an affluent area close to New York City. Regular train commuter Rachel, (Emily Blunt) watches the world go by from her train window, focusing on the lives of a few families in one particular street she can see from the tracks. We learn that one of those houses is where she used to live, and is now occupied by her ex-husband Tom, and his new wife and baby. His wife Anna (Rebecca Ferguson) employs a nanny, Megan, who is also the wife of a near-neighbour. There is some physical similarity between these two women, something which becomes integral to the plot.
Back-stories and flashbacks abound, telling us that Rachel is a bitter alcoholic who is stalking her ex, and experiencing blackouts. Megan’s husband is violent and controlling, and Anna is a lazy mother. The film makes frequent use of captions, such as ‘A week ago’, or ‘Four months earlier’, to do this, so you have to be sure to keep your eyes on the screen at all times, or risk confusion.
Rachel’s constant bothering of Tom’s new family attracts the attentions of the police, and she is warned off by female detective Riley. (Alison Janney) With her drinking getting completely out of control, Rachel begins to alienate everyone around her, including the friend she shares a house with. And the viewer is supposedly left wondering if any of her fears are real, or just drunken fantasies.
Meanwhile, Megan is undergoing therapy, and becoming attracted to her psychiatrist, Dr Abdic. She is hoping to escape her controlling husband by beginning an affair with the doctor, and also resigns as the nanny for Anna’s baby.
Are you with me so far?
So we have a sort-of psychological thriller involving three women who are all connected by the same location, and the relationships they once had, or have now.
Then Megan goes missing, and is feared dead. Rachel becomes a suspect, and Megan’s husband becomes a suspect too.
Then it all gets rather silly, to be honest. Clumsy twists, unbelievable coincidences, clueless cops accepting the obvious, and a drunk woman who seems to be the only one who knows what is actually happening. Secrets are revealed in flashback, and the eventual denouement becomes an ‘Oh really?’ moment.
This film is nowhere near as good as it thinks it is. Usually reliable actors choose hysteria over nuance, and the criss-cross timeline is neither arty, nor well-handled. We have seen many similar films before, and all of them are better than this one.
I can only hope that the book was better.
I think I’ll watch this for Emily Blunt, she always delivers for me.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well don’t say I didn’t warn you, V! 🙂
Cheers, Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for the advice.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I never watched the film because I thought the book was a bit of a mess. I hated all the characters and I figured out the bit twist way too early on. I don’t think I can be bothered with the film.
LikeLiked by 1 person
That’s a good plan, Abbi. Nobody involved is remotely interesting or sympathetic.
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLike
Great review and recommendation, Pete! Thank you! Michael
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks,, Michael. My recommendation is to not bother watching it. 🙂
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person
🙂
LikeLike
I thought the book was ridiculous. There seems to be a whole stream of novels claiming to be the new “Gone Girl,” another silly novel. Apparently the unreliable narrator has just been discovered by the mass market. Thanks for the pan of the movie.
LikeLiked by 1 person
If the book was that bad, the film was even worse, I’m sure.
‘The fastest-selling hardback in history’.
That says a great deal about changing tastes…
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think I’ll ship over this one.
LikeLiked by 1 person
That’s the best plan, GP.
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I passed it up.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Good move, Cindy!
Best wishes, Pete. x
LikeLiked by 1 person
I read but I think I must have been in the minority. I did not enjoy it as much as the reviews led me to believe I would.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks, Maggie. I certainly didn’t enjoy the film! 🙂
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Haven’t done either, and won’t now 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Good plan, FR! 🙂
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Also I’ve done a post!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Naturally, I didn’t get told about it! Checking it out soon.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It came through just now, after I had commented. 🙂
LikeLike
You could have put the sp0ilers in this one, nonetheless, I shall avoid it. Thanks, Warmest regards, Theo
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks, Theo. The whole thing was a spoiler!
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I read the book first then watched the movie. The movie explained some things that I missed in the book because I was seeing her thoughts. This story went back and forth so much it was hard to know when she was thinking or actually in the moment. I did like the book and we also went over it at our ladies book club.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks, Vicky. Perhaps I should have read the book, and ignored the film. 🙂
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLike
I remember reading the reviews when this film came out. Currently, it’s still “rotten” at 45% on Rotten Tomatoes. I’ve never really been interested in seeing the film.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Good decision, David. I am glad that it was free on the TV. 🙂
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I watched this last year with three other people. They all thought it was great, only I thought it was poor. It was one of those films which annoyed me while watching it, couldn’t wait for it to end.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I was hoping for a better ending, after sitting through all those histrionics. 🙂
Thanks, BF.
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I liked the book but hated the film.
LikeLiked by 1 person
That sounds about right. 🙂
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I sort of liked the book, but the plot was rather silly. I watched the film for about 15 minutes and couldn’t stand all the hysterics going on!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, it was certainly the ‘hysteria’ school of acting in evidence, Jude. 🙂
Best wishes, Pete. x
LikeLiked by 1 person
The book was not great, Pete….and I have never seen the film, thankfully….
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think you can happily give it a wide berth, Sue. 🙂
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Don’t worry, I shall!
LikeLiked by 1 person