David is a British blogger who goes by the name Tasker Dunham. He has his own site, which you can access from this link.
https://www.taskerdunham.com
THE EXORCIST
When my son was about eight, he wanted to know what was the scariest film I had ever seen.
“Well,” I said, “there are quite a few, but one of them is so scary that even its name is too frightening to say.”
No eight year-old would let me off that easily, and when it became obvious he was not going to give up I said that I would only tell him when he was eighteen. For now, all I was prepared to say was that it began with an ‘e’. “The rest is too terrifying to think about,” I repeated.
“Excalibur” he said without hesitation, trying to guess.
“I don’t think there is such a ….”
“Yes there is,” he said, “what about The Executioner?”
“Even if it was I wouldn’t tell you,” I said after again having been corrected about the existence of such a film.
“Excrement,” he guessed. I really doubted that one, but not wanting to risk being found ignorant a third time I simply repeated what I’d said already.
This continued on and off for the next few weeks, with him trying out the names of various films, or anything he imagined might be the name of a film, beginning with ‘e’, and me continuing to repeat I was not going to tell him until he was eighteen.
“Ectoplasm?”
“I’m not saying.”
“The Epidermis?”
“I’m not saying.”
“Endoscopy?”
Wherever did he learn these words?
“The Exorcist,” he said one day, eyes bright in triumph.
“Look, I’ve already said, I’m not going to …”
“Oh! For goodness’ sake,” my wife said, “just tell him and then we can put an end to this stupid game. Otherwise we’ll have all gone mad long before he’s eighteen, assuming we’ve not strangled you first.”
“It’s too frightening to think about,” I persisted lamely, “even the title.”
It must have been around April, 1974, that I first saw ‘The Exorcist’ at the ABC Cinema in Leeds, soon after its U.K. release. Masses wanted to see the most talked about film of the year, and Leeds audiences were swelled by swarms of Bradfordians whose local council had banned it.* Three of us from the rented house we shared, myself, Nick and Brendan, joined the queue that stretched along Vicar Lane, creeping slowly forwards. A clergyman and a couple of helpers walked up and down handing out leaflets, trying to persuade us that the film was the work of the devil. I saw no one leave the queue. Upon reaching the door we were told “Sorry there’s only one seat left, and it’s the last one”. Nick and Brendan pushed me forward and went off to the pub trying to hide their relief. I nervously went inside to see the film on my own.
I have never been so petrified in all my life. I sat in the dark clutching the arm rests, flesh creeping, my face twisted into a rictus grimace, involuntary tears streaming from my eyes. It is the quality of the sound as much as the images that makes cinema so powerful, and they had the volume right up, especially as the nauseating voice of the ancient demon Pazuzu rasped from the throat of Regan, the twelve year old girl possessed by his spirit.
Nick and Brendan saw it fairly soon afterwards, and a few weeks later we decided to see it again. The second time the cinema was three quarters empty. A few rows in front of us, on her own, was an old witch of a woman rustling a big bag of popcorn, cackling loudly at just about everything she saw and heard.
“Whoa! What a shot!” she shrieked as Regan’s vomit blasted Father Damien Karras, the exorcist, in the face, lodging behind his spectacles like a clump of green pus. “Bet you can’t go round again,” she squealed after Regan’s head had spun full circle, cracking and crunching the neck. And she just snorted hysterically when the demon told Karras how his mother spent her time in hell.
It put the film in an entirely different light. For the next few weeks our house grated to the sound of Exorcist impersonations. Loud rasping shouts of “Karras, Karras,” scraped like sandpaper from room to room as Brendan raucously yelled “your mother cooks socks in hell” all the way down the stairs from his attic bedroom. It is a good job the walls of our terraced house were thick enough to avoid disturbing the neighbours. It was very rare to hear any sound from them at all.
It truly was a shocking film, but it also has hilarious aspects some will always refuse to acknowledge. In Miami, Father Mark Karras, an Orthodox priest who had conducted exorcisms for real, sued the creators of the book and film, alleging they had based the story on him, having fictionalised his name, personality and professional life. He claimed that some characteristics of the film were so offensive he had been exposed to public humiliation, embarrassment, scorn and obloquy. William Peter Blatty, the book’s author, was forced to testify that he had never previously met nor heard of him.**
And then there were the town councillors and eccentric individuals who wanted the film banned, such as the outspoken Dr. Rhodes Boyson, a Conservative Member of Parliament with unruly mutton-chops and a pantomime Lancashire accent (all Lancashire accents are pantomime to Yorkshire ears), who had previously been a headmaster. Indeed, in a large number of towns, including Bradford, the film was banned, resulting in ‘Exorcist Bus Trips’ taking groups of people to neighbouring towns where it was showing. Later, the video version was not officially cleared for sale in the U.K. until 1999.
But my favourite proscriber has to be the Tunisian government who banned the film on the ground that it presented “unjustified” propaganda in favour of Christianity.*** I wonder what their idea of anti-Christian propaganda might be.
* * *
In the end I did hold out without revealing the film’s name until my son was eighteen, in spite of his repeated assertion “It’s The Exorcist, isn’t it?” and my refusal either to confirm or deny it.
“Only someone with an autistic spectrum disorder could be so obstinate,” my wife kept complaining. I know they secretly think I’ve got Asperger’s Syndrome, and I also know they must be wrong, because if I did have Asperger’s Syndrome, I would find it difficult to empathise with people, and I wouldn’t know what they were thinking, would I?
Shortly after conceding that my son had been right all along, the film was shown very late one night on television, and I videotaped it.
“Don’t you dare watch that while I’m in the house,” my wife said. I doubted I dared watch it while she wasn’t. Eventually, one morning when alone, I found the courage to put it on. I could only bear it for ten minutes before I had to turn it off due to boredom.
* It was rather inconsistent of the two city councils because two years earlier we had to go to the Bradford Odeon to see ‘A Clockwork Orange’ which had been banned in Leeds.
** The Times 30th May 1974 page 9. Father Mark Athanasios Constantine Karras later became the Archbishop of Byzantium.
*** The Times 11th March 1974 page 2 and 25th February 1975 page 6.
Reproduction of The Exorcist poster is believed to constitute fair use.
Check out David’s site on Blogger, and give him a welcome to the WordPress community!
A great post!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks, Jennie. This has been my ‘top post’ this week, so far. 🙂
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I’m not surprised. Best to you, Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks, Jennie.
LikeLiked by 1 person
You are welcome!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Okay, my sister was reading the book version of The Exorcists back in the day, she said it was so evil she drove to the ocean, and threw the book in the waves! I went out and bought a new copy, baptized it in the kitchen sink, and placed it on her nightstand!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Did you ever watch the film though, Cheryl? 🙂
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Yes and have been traumatized ever since! Maybe I need to give it a second view? Maybe it won’t be so distressing decades later?
LikeLiked by 2 people
I watched it again after 20 years, and found it rather silly. 🙂
It still has a few scary moments tough.
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I’m now wondering what was your sister’s reaction to the book on the nightstand.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Haha, Tasker, I couldn’t keep a straight face, and after she threw the book at me so to speak, we both had a good laugh!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’ve probably told this story before, but…
Back in 1974-75, I was a student in Nice, France. I purchased “The Exorcist” in French translation, and read the entire book in one sitting on a Saturday. That night, I went to a late showing that let out in the wee hours of the morning. Walking back to the studio on Ave. de la Californie, I could hear my footsteps resounding, as the avenue was totally deserted. As I approached a corner (the building there was wedge-shaped due to the angle of the intersection), a woman jumped out in front of me, and scared the bejesus out of me! She was a prostitute, but she might as well have been Regan!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks, David. It’s worth telling again. 🙂
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I bet you don’t half know some obscene words in French though.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ah Pete, you know I don’t do horror, but I have actually seen this and thought it was a bit bonkers, completely silly, and not one bit scary. Maybe I’m doing it wrong 😀
LikeLiked by 2 people
As the post says, we also thought that the second time we saw it, but the first time I was scared out of my wits.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I enjoyed your post though I’ve never watched The Exorcist.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Never too late to catch that film, Mary. 🙂
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I feel I know too much about it, now 🙂
LikeLiked by 2 people
I wouldn’t bother. As the other comments say, it was far scarier at the time than it would be now we have modern special effects.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Enjoyed your post, David. Although I never saw The Exorcist, I had a friend who did. Prior to seeing the film, the “Cat Clock” in her kitchen was innocuous. After the film, she said its eyes followed her everywhere. It terrified her so much she threw it away!
LikeLiked by 2 people
I had a friend who had a cat-clock. It’s eyes moved to count the seconds. Spooky! 🙂
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Serves her right for having a cat clock in the first place.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for reposting Pete. I’m delighted that it seems to have evoked lots of others’ memories.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Anytime, David. Always a pleasure. 🙂
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLike
I have never seen the Exorcist and I have no desire to. I did see Clockwork Orange when it first came out in Australia. 4 of us went and I recall having an intelligent conversation afterwards, but can’t remember what we actually thought!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks, Janet. Both films were considered to be very shocking in their day.
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks for reading. These days I won’t watch any film or tv programme that looks nasty. Don’t want my sensibilities blunted.
LikeLiked by 2 people
While neither the book nor the movie are the scariest horror I’ve been exposed to, they’re great classics of the genre. I love that exchange between David and his son!😁
LikeLiked by 2 people
At the time, it did seem very scary, but horror films have got a lot worse since. 🙂
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks. It really is as it happened (well almost). He’s a clever lad (proud dad).
LikeLiked by 2 people
An all-time classic! 😀
LikeLiked by 2 people
Yes, it was a ‘you had to be there’ film, Kevin. 🙂
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 2 people
And I was. 😀
LikeLiked by 1 person
I suppose it is, but there are other all time classics I would rather watch now.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Oh, without a doubt. 😉
LikeLiked by 2 people
“The power of Christ compells you!” The best thing is to watch “Repossessed” with Leslie Nielsen afterwards.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Yes, the spoof film put it all into perspective. 🙂
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks. I’ve just looked it up and see it’s a comedy. I might look out for that but will turn it off if there’s anything nasty.
LikeLiked by 1 person
That one did it for me. I really half to block out the images from my head. It turned me into a scaredy-cat.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I bet if you saw it again now, it wouldn’t be half so scary. 🙂
Best wishes, Pete. x
LikeLiked by 1 person
Only if you held my hand and I peeked through my fingers with the other!
LikeLiked by 2 people
That’s a deal! 🙂 x
LikeLiked by 2 people
I’m 100% with you Cindy. Although as I said, we did quite soon learn to laugh at it. I can still do the voice.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I never saw that one. Rosemary’s Baby is the scariest film I went to see at the cinema. I guess the scary films were good for young blokes to take their girlfriends to 😁
LikeLiked by 2 people
I think it was a lot scarier than Rosemary’s baby, Jude. 🙂
Best wishes, Pete. x
LikeLiked by 2 people
Probably why I didn’t go and see it Pete! I am not a fan of horror movies.
LikeLiked by 1 person
And what became of the young bloke who took you? I hope you’re not going to say “Reader, I married him.”
LikeLiked by 2 people
Haha… now that would be fun! I didn’t go to the cinema much with the lads, or at least certainly not to cuddle. I’d get very annoyed if that was their intent!
LikeLiked by 2 people
haha, I know a few people who refused to eat pea soup after seeing that movie!
LikeLiked by 2 people
I recall stories of people passing out and being taken ill in cinemas. Halcyon days, GP! 🙂
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 2 people
When watching it, it is wise to remember it is Hollywood – no reality.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Haha. I’ve got red-green colour deficiency so that aspect never bothered me.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Reminds me of a film my wife wanted to watch the other night from the same period. After about 20 minutes she was on the Guide Channel looking for something else. I concluded then that some films are better remembered than actually watched again, warmest regards, Theo
LikeLiked by 2 people
It didn’t really hold up that well, once modern film-making techniques delivered much creepier horror. But at the time, it was something very special. 🙂
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Were we easier, more unworldly enough, to think we were seeing what the filmmaker presented?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Spot on. The first ten minutes were so dull. I’ve still got the recording but no VHS player any more so it will stay like that.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Great story, David. I suppose I must have seen the film, but can’t remember whether it was on television or at ‘the flicks’. I’m not a fan of horror films in general, probably due to my nervous disposition…….. 😉
LikeLiked by 2 people
It was something amazing at the time, Jon. I haven’t seen it since, but I doubt it would seem so scary now.
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Like, for instance, Psycho?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Me too. I would say if you can’t remember whether or not you’ve seen it, then you haven’t. Either that or you’re not as nervous as you think you are.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s quite amusing how we are frightened stiff the first time, but the next time watching doesn’t have anywhere near the same effect!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Yes, it was something special at the time. So many spoofs and much scarier films later, it just comes across as amusing..
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks for reading Sue. Yes, the second time was a hoot, although the lady in front was funnier. I suspect she was playing to the audience.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Very probably!
LikeLiked by 1 person
A great post. I’ve only ever watched the movie on the telly so I missed all the excitement, although I had a similar experience to the second time the watched it with the Blair Witch Project…
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks, Olga. I remember watching the film in an East London cinema, at an afternoon showing.
My girlfriend at the time was so terrified, she hid her face under the huge lapels of the jacket I was wearing. 🙂
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person
That’s one I’ve not seen, and probably won’t be. Although I’m a lot less impressionable now. When we went to see Jurassic World I laughingly pointed out to my daughter which people were going to get eaten by the dinosaurs and was 100% right.
LikeLiked by 1 person