Scientific Studies.
I really should stop watching the news.
Ever since I can remember, we have been bombarded with scientific advice. The source is usually referred to as a ‘study’. Sometimes credited, as in ‘A study by Cambridge University’, or a ‘Study by doctors in Sweden, over a ten year period’.
On many occasions, it conflicts a ‘study’ that was all the rage a few years earlier.
Many years ago, I used to take sugar in my hot drinks, and drink ordinary Coke. Sugar made me fat, and made my teeth bad. I didn’t need a study to tell me that, if my trousers were tight, and I needed fillings at the dentist. Then came sweeteners, like Aspartame. They are the answer, a ‘study’ said. So I swapped, and for the next thirty years I had that sweetener in tea and coffee, as well as buying ‘diet’ drinks containing it.
Then along came another ‘study’. Aspartame was very bad for you. It gave you bladder cancer, if you used it for too long. Oops! Well, a bit more than an ‘Oops’ for me, after more than half my life adding it to drinks. In a panic, I contacted the company, and they duly sent me a very large envelope containing the results of the much-quoted study. They also mentioned that lawsuits were ongoing in America, and that those suing were unlikely to win.
The ‘study’ had used rats, feeding them around half their body weight in Aspartame tablets every day, for months on end. By the end of the study, those rodents were so full of artificial sweetener, they couldn’t avoid getting something seriously wrong with them. So the study was correct. If I consumed around 84 pounds of Aspartame every day for a year, I would get ill. It seems that the ‘scientists’ were unable to see the flaw in their findings, as I was unlikely to ever take in more than half an ounce of the stuff, in a week.
Then we had red meat. Good for Iron, and an ideal source of protein.
Hang on, there’s a study. It gives you bowel cancer, because you can’t digest it.
Delve deeper into that study, and you might discover that you would have to eat a couple of very large steaks every day, for most of your life.
It carried on. Pork gives you cancer. Seafood is too high in cholesterol. Real milk (unpasteurised) carries disease. Red wine? Yes, it’s good for you.
Not too much now, just a sip.
Rice, bread, and potatoes. Best avoided, due to taking in too much carbohydrate. And you might get bloating, perhaps even Chrohn’s disease.
Five A Day! remember that study. A fist sized portion of fruit and vegetables at least five times a day. But how big is a fist? Does orange juice count? Perhaps not, as it produces natural sugars in your digestive system, and you might get Diabetes if you drink too much fruit juice. And too many apples will give you gastric reflux, because of the acidity. Oh, and dentists say that too much fruit is bad for your teeth, because of the fruit acids. And pineapples can cut your gums…and…
You get my drift, I’m sure.
Just had a lovely little baby?. Well, make sure it sleeps on its back. Wait a minute, didn’t a study tell us that a baby will choke on its back? I’m sure it did. Better make sure your baby sleeps on its front then. But no, don’t do that! I’ve read a study that says babies sleeping on their front will smother themselves. You are going to have to find a way for baby to sleep siting up, that’s the only way it will survive.
As far as I am concerned, those invisible scientists can shove their next study up where the sun don’t shine.
I agree with you again, friend=and there is a lot of money spent on these studies. The amount of stress these studies cause is enough to kill you anyway! haha!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks, Michele. We rarely disagree. 😉
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person
You are absolutely right, Pete. We just need to use our own common sense.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks, Jennie. Too much ‘nannying’ these days. 🙂
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well said!
LikeLiked by 2 people
A recent study showed that scientists who produced studies for the sake of producing studies were more likely to suffer from haemorrhoids than any other subsection in society as they where more often than not told where to shove their studies.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I hope that study quoted my blog!
Cheers mate, Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person
LoL, so true, Pete! We should not forget every researcher did it saving her/ his job, and or getting a higher graduation. The industries uses it to make more profit, or keeping the others out of business.
LikeLiked by 2 people
They deliberately avoid telling us that vested interests pay them for providing the statistics they want to hear.
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLike
I recently read that babies should not be put to sleep sitting up! Truly. Apparently there were devices to help prop up babies so they could sleep. They were very very BAD! I am amazed that any of us survived our cribs with bars, blankets, toys and sleeping whichever way we ended up.
LikeLiked by 2 people
How did any of us make it through the 50s, Elizabeth?
best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It is amazing. No helmets, no seat belts, crud food, tree climbing, jumping off high places!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’ve read enough of those to be fully in agreement with you, Pete. It’s impossible to follow all the advice they dish out, and it is of limited use… Oh well…
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks, Olga. Working in medicine, those ‘studies’ must be a nightmare!
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLike
As far as food goes, everything in moderation! Enjoy it all, you only live once 🙂
LikeLiked by 2 people
I prefer excess, I confess. But not in all things. 🙂
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLike
I’m afraid too many of these “studies” start out with a preconceived expectation. Your premise reminds me of a book I read a long time ago in college called How to Lie with Statistics.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks, Pete.
I used to take a lot of notice of these at one time. Then I decided on the ‘James Dean’ approach.
Live fast, die young. 🙂
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLike
i agree with you completely, Pete! 🙂 🙂 moderation is the key 🙂
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks, Wilma. Moderation is fine, until it comes to red wine! 🙂
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Great post 🙂 One has to be very careful concerning Scientific Studies. Anyway, keep up the great work as always 🙂
LikeLiked by 2 people
I have stopped believing any of them now.
Thanks, John.
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Made me smile. Let me recommend raw honey as a sweetener. We produce it on our property and it’s delicious. The bees also pollinate our vegetables and flowers. Very good for you on many levels!
LikeLiked by 2 people
I have it on toast sometimes, and have used it in coffee in the past.
Thanks, Felicity.
Best wishes, Pete. x
LikeLiked by 1 person
I don’t think there is enough room to put all the studies where you want them to be put–some run into thousands of pages plus date and other appendices 🙂 Unfortunately, space is at a premium ther and stuff does not stay in there very long. 🙂
Warmest regards, Theo
LikeLiked by 2 people
Yes, even at my size there is not enough room for all those reports! 🙂
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s a wonder the human race has survived as long as it has, really. There’s seems to be nothing to eat that doesn’t have a health warning attached.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I ignore all of them, Mary. If I got it wrong, I won’t complain. 🙂
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Not only survived but many living longer than in recorded history.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Even breathing is bad for you but hey, we’re all going to die in the end so we may as well eat a little bit of red meat or whatever floats our teeth until the grim reaper raises his scythe…
LikeLiked by 2 people
Yes, I gave up worrying about it, but not being irritated by it. 🙂
Thanks, Stevie.
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person
We live in nannying times, but basically people will eat and drink precisely what they want to!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I agree with the ‘moderation’ theory, except I mostly don’t and am likely to prove several studies right, including conflicting ones! 😊
LikeLiked by 2 people
I have concluded that I will just prove them all right too, in different ways. I don’t expect to see 80! 🙂
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Us neither. Morbid lot that we are 🤣🤣
LikeLiked by 1 person
I don’t want to live long enough to forget who I am. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
I love this particular rant Pete. The latest argument is over aspirin and whether healthy adults should take it every day.🤷🏻♀️
LikeLiked by 2 people
Yes Aspirin thins the blood and helps with clogged arteries.
BUT it can also irritate the stomach lining, and cause excessive bleeding if you cut yourself.
Decisions, decisions… 🙂
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person
And now possibly brain bleeds.🤷🏻♀️
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m waiting for the next ‘study’ that tells us it is too dangerous to take at all! 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Don’t forget the damage to the kidneys which processes the aspirin in the end. Warmest regards, Ed
LikeLiked by 1 person
Too much news is bad for health, I think.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Definitely! 🙂
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLike
🤣🤣🤣🤣
LikeLiked by 1 person
Agree with everything you said, Pete…what used to be “bad” is suddenly “good” – there are “good fats” and now they’ve decided after decades of telling us NOT to eat eggs – hey, eggs are good! Well, I’ll stay on my usual egg intake without advice from someone who wears a white coat…
LikeLiked by 2 people
John, you eat enough garlic to live to 100! 🙂 🙂
Let’s hope they don’t change their minds about that being good for you.
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pete, garlic and red wine will keep us alive forever – and if not, it was a fun ride while it lasted!
LikeLiked by 1 person
That’s just how I see it too! 🙂 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
One had to wonder how an egg could every have been bad for one to eat if the egg can produce a fully functional chicken (duck of whatever species laid it) with just the addition of a small sperm? Warmest regards, Ed
LikeLiked by 2 people
Great point!
LikeLiked by 1 person
“As far as I am concerned, those invisible scientists can shove their next study up where the sun don’t shine.”
You can’t escape the sun in Southern Nevada. Not even if you’re a scientist with a seat-of-the-pants study.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks, David. Nicely done! 🙂
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ah, Pete, where would we be without your rants….. All things in moderation
LikeLiked by 1 person
They should do a ‘study’ on rants! 🙂
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLike
…to assess mental well-being??
LikeLiked by 1 person
To prove it is good for calming me down. 🙂
LikeLiked by 2 people
😊😊
LikeLiked by 1 person
My view, for what it is worth Pete, is all things in moderation and when it comes to baby, do what ever stops them howling.
LikeLiked by 4 people
Thanks, Robbie. Good old commonsense will see us through. 🙂
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, so many studies that run contradictory to previously made ones. Take rice for example. It is our staple food here, we eat it three times a day. I guess the thing is, we should all eat in moderation.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I’m sure you could find a study that would tell you not to eat rice three times a day, Arlene.
Then there would be another one that claims that is good for you.
That’s the problem. 🙂
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Quite like it Pete 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Isn’t three times a day “in moderation?” Warmest regards, Ed
LikeLiked by 1 person
Eat moderately and exercise….that has worked well for me…..speaking of pork…Trump boyz are lowering the standards here…..https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/2019/9/18/20869186/trump-administrations-slaughterhouse-rules-usda-pigs that is stupid it will mean that we will lose some markets…..this guy is a MORON chuq
LikeLiked by 3 people
We get local pork from pigs that live outside, and are well-tended. Can’t beat the flavour.
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person
So very true….pork in the US is tasteless and a bit tough….chuq
LikeLiked by 1 person
To defend science, the difficulties occur not in the studies themselves but in attempts to report them simply to vewers and readers who can’t or won’t engage with the complexities. These are rarely simple issues but scientific methods tend to break them down out of context in order to investigate one bit at a time. I do not defend bad ethics though, other than to say that in other areas, sensibilities have changed in the past few years.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Thanks for your thoughts, David. We have much to thank Science for, Penicillin for example, but those constant ‘studies’ just drive me crazy!
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLike
Perhaps the paradigm for reporting scientific studies should be changed. Warmest regards, Theo
LikeLiked by 1 person
Your rant made me smile and I know the sensation you outline so fully. Diet is a minefield and scientists who dabble in it are brave but they would to better to stick to computing or engineering. The problem with the human body is its incredible complexity and it’s unpredictability.
The fact is in the rich western nations we are approaching a life expectancy of about 80 years and back in the old stone age were lucky to reach 40. Of course many of us are kept alive by modern medicine way beyond the ages of our grandfathers. Now the discussion centres around quality of life ; is it worth dragging on a dependant existence ?
LikeLiked by 3 people
Thanks, I enjoy the occasional rant. 🙂
When I worked in The London Ambulance Service, we dealt on a daily basis with people in their 80s and 90s. Most are totally dependent. Some don’t know who they are, or where they are. Others sit in care homes staring at fish tanks or televisions until it is time for a meal, or to go to bed.
All of them spend around a third of their lives in and out of hospital.
Yes, there are amazing old people. Marathon running at 95, cycling into their late 80s, or still creating art and literature up to the age of 100. But they are few and far between.
Quality of life is a relative term, but I think we all know what it means to each of us.
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Reblogged this on Wilfred Books and commented:
Scientific studies, especially those involving research on animals, should be treated with great circumspection.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I know exactly where you’re coming from, Pete. Of course, scientists and other, more non-specific experts, have a function and a rôle to play in a civilised society, but many studies are sponsored by commercial interests which obviously have an agenda to further; I think it’s arguable that the emotional distress created by all these health scares causes more illness than they cure. Medical research using animals is notoriously unreliable, as proved by my grand uncle, when he was secretary of the National Anti-Vivisection Society, and who is the subject of my biography, Black Shirt and Smoking Beagles. More than 100 years of torturing animals for negligible benefit to humanity is not a good record to endorse, is it?
LikeLiked by 2 people
Blinding rabbits to stop shampoo being a bit irritating in my eyes is not something I ever wanted, or endorsed. Stuffing rats with cooking fat to prove something I already knew (It’s bad for you) is disgusting too.
Organisations that were created to ensure drug safety for humans gave rise to open season on animal testing. I think if we were all taken to see the apes and monkeys being tortured in labs, or the pigs being shot with explosive bullets for army tests, we might all change our minds about a lot of things.
I actually worry about the people who can work in such places. They seem to me to lack basic humanity.
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 2 people