The Revenge of the Malthusians and the Science of Limits

Words of wisdom and warning from Lara. Find out more on her site.

Lara Trace Hentz

Repackaged system of EUGENICS?

This Borg-like deterministic faith in the human-machine synthesis that pervades the thinking of all modern transhumanists is both cultish, creepy and just plain wrong. However, without a proper evaluation of the historic roots of these ideas, which threaten to push global civilization into a dystopian nightmare, it is impossible to understand anything fundamental about the past 250 years of human experience, let alone see where the fatal flaws lie within the Great Reset/Transhumanist operating system. That system, of course, is simply a repackaged system of eugenics under a new name that was developed in the aftermath of World War II.

Please read this. It’s really important.

This is HUGELY important to know – the “who” and “how” we are/were controlled as useless eaters and disposables. I just finished compiling a book “Finding the Invisibles” about these very same guys.


View original post

9 thoughts on “The Revenge of the Malthusians and the Science of Limits

  1. Thats a very interesting post, Pete! I hope you had read it. I never before had heard about Thomas Malthusius, and his influence on the Club of Rome, and at least the WEF. I can add a very interesting book, i found last year. It from a noble, a Count named Richard Nicolas v. Coudenhove-Kalergi. He wrote it in 1922 with the title “Der Adel” (The nobility), not far from my hometown, in the former so called “Sudetenland”. You can find it for free at He was the founder of the Paneuropa Union, and most politican say he was the trailblazer of the political European Union. Only with his meaning, democracy was a decision based on the lack of nobility, and will disappear after this new nobility has been created again. xx Michael

    Liked by 1 person

  2. I am aware of this theory. On a pedantic note [for general interest only, as I know it’s not your graphic, Pete] the graphic is conveying the opposite of what it wants to say: it should say “…mankind was condemned to destruction unless world government and population reduction WERE made government policy.” Double negatives can be confusing 😉 Cheers, Jon.

    Liked by 1 person

All comments welcome

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.