Before the outbreak of the First World War, uncredited photographers were recording daily life in Central London. I found some rare photos of places that no longer exist. The streets are still there, but the buildings have changed completely. Some were destroyed by bombing in WW2, others demolished later for the building of modern office blocks.
Women working at spinning wheels in the City of London, 1908.
A nursery for working mothers. Deptford, South London. 1909.
A chimney sweep photographed with his family. City of London, 1900.
Cloth Fair. A street in the City of London, 1908.
A shop with the owners living above. Central London, 1910.
A stationery company. Smithfield, London, 1908. They also sold tobacco products, and a shop in the alleyway sold meats.
An upholstery business. Smithfield, London, 1909.
Interesting photos. Some of those buildings looked older than the 19th century. Whenever I see such photos I wish I could go in and look inside the buildings! I often zoom in and look to see if I can see anything in the windows, but alas, I never can!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I feel sure that the wooden buildings dated from the reconstruction after the Great Fire, and were late 17th century.
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLike
Wonderful!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Glad you liked them, Jennie.
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person
đ
LikeLike
Very impressive photos, Pete! Thanks for your efforts on finding and presenting them. Sorry, i am once again late, because my weeks are going more and more asynchronous. Best wishes, Michael
LikeLiked by 1 person
Glad you enjoyed the photos, Michael.
Best wishes, Pete
LikeLike
Reblogged this on NEW BLOG HERE >> https:/BOOKS.ESLARN-NET.DE.
LikeLike
What fabulous photos! I was particularly taken with the photo of the nursery. I somehow imagined that working women would leave their children with grandparents or aunts and uncles, but there were obviously many who did not have access to an extended family. Or perhaps had enough surplus cash to pay for professional childcare.
How demoralizing that well over 100 years later, very little has changed.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m glad you enjoyed them. It is unlikely that the working mothers would have had to pay for the nursery in such a poor district. It was probably supplied by their employer, usually a factory. By organising a workplace nursery, they could guarantee a steady supply of working women at lower wages than they had to pay the men.
The grandparents would stil have been working of course, so unlikely to be able to look after the children. People worked until they were too ill to carry on, or died. There was no social security, only the Parish Workhouse. And life expectancy was also much shorter than it is now, with no organised state healthcare, and most unable to afford doctor’s charges or the cost of medicine.
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oh, I didn’t think of that. How telling that these days women are still paid less, but employers no longer provide the childcare.
Very thought provoking.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Interesting pictures and comments. Working class women have always worked, no matter what Betty Friedan and the Feminine Mystique (a very interesting book, for sure, and right in many aspects, but a bit limited in its scope) might have thought. And farmer’s wives would definitely work also, and not only at home, although there was plenty of that. I would love to have visited that stationer/bookshop. There would be some treasures there! Thanks, Pete!
LikeLiked by 1 person
You are right about that, Olga. My mum worked full-time from the age of 14, until her last job at the age of 75! Being a ‘housewife’ was never an option for her.
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLike
Oh, wow! Thatâs history
LikeLiked by 1 person
I have some that are older than these. I will sort them into a post soon.
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Look forward to it!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Most of the photos of that era here show the newly burgeoning telephone and electric lines overhead. I saw nary a wire in these photos. Kudos. Warmest regards, Ed
LikeLiked by 1 person
I suspect it was still oil lamps and candles for most people before WW1, Ed. As for telephones, they were still considered to be a luxury when I was a child in the 1950s.
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLike
Fascinating pictures, the nursery for working mothers particularly. Imagine trying to get away with those child-to-staff ratios now! I didn’t realise formalised childcare had been in existence for so long, I wonder if it was a happy place for children?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks, Helen. I suspect it was provided by an employer or a factory. Working-class women would have had to work to contribute to the household bills. The children do at least look clean and well cared-for.
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLike
Do kids today wonder how these people survived without a smart phone? đ¤Şđđ
LikeLiked by 2 people
Many of those people couldn’t even afford to buy a book to read. (And around 30% of the working classes were illiterate anyway) I would love to see their reaction to a smartphone.
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person
(1) Overheard:
Spinner #1: “I can’t get any gold out of this!”
Spinner #2: “If you ask me, the straw is no good.”
(2) I’m having a devil of a time trying to figure out which one is Rosemary’s baby.
(3) Carpet beetles are terrified by carpet beaters.
(4) The girl on Cloth Fair will one day start a business. She’ll name it Pretty Little Thing.
(5) Three men do not window dressing make.
(6) “I just bought two packs of Benson & Hedges and a deluxe edition of Fahrenheit 451.”
(7) Here in the West, we buy up holsters.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I can remember my grandmother beating the carpets over a washing line. Only rich people could afford to pay someone to do it for them. đ
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Great photos, Pete. I imagine the people had stand perfectly still for a bit to get their pictures taken.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, large format field cameras on sturdy tripods with long shutter exposures would have been the type used back then, Don.
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Tongue and bull’s nuts….I will pass…..great old photos…..chuq
LikeLiked by 1 person
Cheap food for the workers, chuq.
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person
đ Those old photos are worthy of being cherished.
Also, it is nice to see what London looked like from 1900 to 1910.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks, Renard. Some parts of London were very elegant at the time. These are the poorer, working-class areas.
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person
These pictures are fascinating, Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I thought so too. They seem to come from a much earlier time.
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thatâs exactly what I thought.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hard to believe it was only a little over 100 year ago. What would those people think if they could see it now! Great photos.
LikeLiked by 1 person
So much has changed since WW1.
Glad you enjoyed the photos.
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on Ed;s Site..
LikeLike
Thank you for this fascinating glimpse into another place and time. The children in the nursery must have been looking at the photographer? They seem to have a what-the-heck-is-going-on here expression.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It might have been the first time they had seen a camera, Liz. Deptford was a very poor area. (Still is, in parts.)
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I thought the setting of the photos looked grim, but I didn’t know if that was just the black-and-white.
LikeLiked by 1 person
wow, these are stunning. and like stevie commented, i had no idea there were nurseries for working mothers or that working mothers were a thing at that time in history.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Deptford was a poor working class area until recently, Beth. Women would have worked to make enough money to live.
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person
that makes perfect sense
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pickled tongues – ugh! I was surprised at the photo of the nursery for working mothers – I didn’t realise there were any then.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It might have been provided by an employer or a factory. Most women in Deptford would have needed to work back then. Pickled cow’s tongues and sweetbreads were cheap food for ordinary people at the time.
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think I would have to draw the line at eating a cow’s tongue.
LikeLiked by 1 person
We used to have sliced Ox tongue is sandwiches when I was younger. You can still buy it. đ
https://www.sainsburys.co.uk/gol-ui/product/ProductDisplay?storeId=10151&productId=1355972&langId=44&istCompanyId=1e096408-041f-4238-994e-a7cf46bf9413&istFeedId=689af7a8-5842-4d88-be59-1ee5688a81b5&istItemId=ilrxwqwmm&istBid=t&&cmpid=cpc&utm_source=Google&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=15424330555&utm_content=shopping&utm_term=%7bsku%7d&utm_custom1=129852755749&utm_custom2=759-449-0952&gclid=CjwKCAjw-L-ZBhB4EiwA76YzOY-oVFvMp-jfsw1LqnV4ETyrBfyb4rTd3wA6iUDe9Z78g_Db0b5NLRoCyHkQAvD_BwE&gclsrc=aw.ds
LikeLiked by 1 person
Er… no I’d rather not, Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person