Ever since 1914, we have been used to seeing images of wars. Soldiers, battles, and the mechanical weapons of war too. More recently, we can watch modern wars ‘live’ with reporters bringing us footage of battles as they are happening, in Vietnam, Iraq, Syria, or Afghanistan.
But war photography goes back much further than that. In The Crimean War of 1853-1856, intrepid photographers travelled to Russia with the armies, to try to capture the life of the Victorian soldier.
A British Guards Sergeant, proudly posing in his uniform.
British Lancers, from a regiment that would have charged into The ‘Valley of Death’, at Balaclava.
(Photo obviously ‘colourised’)
From 1899-1901, The British Empire fought the army of Dutch settlers in Africa, known as The Boers.
Both sides wanted to retain their influence in two areas of South Africa.
Boer fighters. They were a tough and determined enemy.
British Troops manning a machine gun, taken in 1900 during that war.
But no war was ever previously photographed as much as the US Civil War, from 1861-1865.
Boy drummers, who would have marched into action alongside fighting troops.
Freed slaves and free black men were allowed to fight in the Union Army, though they mainly had white officers commanding them.
Here, some new recruits pose with their weapons.
This was one of the first times that the carnage of war was photographed for public consumption.
The bodies of soldiers after the Battle of Antietam, in 1862.
Confederate dead in the trenches at Vicksburg, Mississippi, 1863.
The body of a dead confederate after the Battle of Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, 1863.
It was later discovered that many such photos were ‘staged’ by some photographers.
The bodies would be moved into specific locations, or arranged in the pose of a supposedly ‘heroic’ death.
There was also some attempt to portray the devastation caused by this long war.
Here is the centre of Charleston, South Carolina, in 1865.
War photography is a dangerous old game at the best of times and I’m sure modern photographers have an occasional moan about DSLR bodies, a few lenses and a laptop to get the digital images sent quickly but when you stop and think about how much kit some of those old photographers would have been hauling around with them….
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, it has always fascinated me.
Cheers, Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person
A picture is worth a thousand words. These tell quite the stories. You’re right that our Civil War was extensively photographed. Best to you, Pete.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks, Jennie. The quality of some of these old photos is astounding.
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Yes, they are.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I absolutely adore old photographs but these are extra special!
LikeLiked by 2 people
I have quite a few old photo posts on here, Krissie. Glad you enjoyed it.
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The video coverage of the Viet Nam War which brought the war into our living rooms had as dramatic effect I think as did Matthew Brady’s photos of the Civil War here. Hard to think war is glorious when you see these scenes.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks, Elizabeth. I recall reading that the newspaper photo of the girl burned by napalm in Vietnam was the one that really ‘turned around’ international opinion about that war. Photos can indeed change history.
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Yes it really did. My antipathy towards Dow Chemical remains to this day.
LikeLiked by 2 people
These photos are amazing Pete, especially considering how long ago they were taken.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I agree, Kim. The quality of most of them is simply staggering.
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 2 people
“Freed slaves and free black men were allowed to fight in the Union Army, though they mainly had white officers commanding them.”
One of my earliest songs, “Osceola Blues,” was inspired by the Battle of Fort Pillow, which is mentioned in the lyrics. Wikipedia: “The battle ended with a massacre of African-American Union troops and their white officers attempting to surrender.”
As a general comment, I’ve always been fascinated by early wartime photographs. Thanks for showing me a few more!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks, David. I almost used a photo of the troops preparing to fight at Fort Pillow, and know the story of the incident well.
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Fascinating, Pete, and as others have said the quality of the photos is excellent. In many ways the development of photographs then was every bit as good as it is today.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Given that they were mostly being developed ‘in the field’, usually in small wagons, I think the talents of the time far exceed those of today. ‘Real’ photographs definitely endure.
Thanks, Mary.
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Those early photographers sure knew what they were doing Pete.
Nicely done.
Besties
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks, Frank. Considering how old they are, they are outstanding images.
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The quality of that last photo is amazing, film at its best and I don’t think you could do any better with today’s gear.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I can only agree, FR. Those early photographers really knew their stuff.
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Impressive! Tragic, if we think about it, but these are important historical documents!
LikeLiked by 2 people
They certainly are, Sam.
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Terrific photos….amazing how proud they all appear….not much has changed over the years….chuq
LikeLiked by 2 people
Very true, chuq. Soldiers staring proudly at us out of photos is something that I doubt will ever change.
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 2 people
THat was a good mix of soldiers and the aftermath of wars….well don my friend chuq
LikeLiked by 2 people