I found these photos by the keen amateur photographer Edward Linley Sambourne, who was also the chief cartoonist for Punch magazine. They are early examples of candid street photography, using a hand-held camera. He was obviously interested in the fashions of the day, and as you can see, most women were still wearing corsets and very long dresses or skirts at the time.
A ‘modern’ young lady, stepping out. She appears to be full of confidence.
Described by the photographer as a ‘Common shop-girl’, this lady is reading a book as she walks along. Much like people looking at their phones today.
A ‘progressive’ lady walking with her bicycle. She would have been making something of a ‘statement’, in 1906.
This lady is carrying a ‘modern’ handbag. The forerunner of today’s familiar female handbags.
Another ‘handbag and book’ lady.
Two elegant friends walking together. They are also carrying books and one has a letter in her hand, ready to post it.
And two more doing the same.
Some ladies at the time favoured black, or dark clothing. Sometimes this was to indicate modesty, or they may have been in mourning. Here are two of them. The first lady appears to have spotted the photographer.
A well-to-do older couple exiting their carriage in Central London.
Women and children wandering in a London Park. The children were dressed in very similar clothes to the adults.
Can you imagine wearing so much clothing in high Summer?
Wasn’t his really fashion? I love it. Thanks for sharing, Pete! xx Michael
LikeLiked by 1 person
Most ladies at the time were very elegant.
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Reblogged this on NEW BLOG HERE >> https:/BOOKS.ESLARN-NET.DE.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“Can you imagine wearing so much clothing in high Summer?”
This is a question put to historical costumers and re- enactors. They all say that you don’t feel as hot as you imagine you would be because all the fabrics are from natural fibres (cottons/linens) and thus allow the skin to breathe, and there is less perspiration wearing breathable natural fabrics as opposed to wearing modern synthetic clothing (polyesters/nylons/lycra). This was even said in response to wearing Tudor clothing in the summer! (of which there were more layers than what the Edwardians wore).
LikeLiked by 1 person
Good point. Natural fibres make a big difference.
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Think of the laundry chore with all that heavy clothing and no modern washing machine!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Most middle-class ladies would still have had servants to do that, Jennie.
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person
What a job, especially for the servants.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Make that all Pete! No middle class lady would be doing laundry, expect maybe rinsing through a fine silk scarf if she didn’t trust the washer woman to treat it gently!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Agreed. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Outer clothing wasn’t washed as frequently as we wash ours because it didn’t directly touch the skin due to their underwear (made of cottons/silks/linens). Underwear was washed more frequently (by the wealthy, but I expect the poor not as much as they wouldn’t have owned that much), and skirts and gowns had any mud brushed from them with stiff brushes. So most laundry on laundry day was in fact underwear and blouses, shirts and small items like detachable collars and shawls.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thank you!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Oh my, the women were so tiny? It looks as if none of them had more than an 18 inch waist? I’m going to go with we have better nutrition and much less fussy clothing! Bahaha! Hugs, C
LikeLiked by 1 person
They were likely wearing tightly-laced corsets, Cheryl. However, most people at the time were considerably slimmer than we are today.
Best wishes, Pete. x
LikeLike
Progressive ladies. Next step Voting.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, many young women became Suffragettes around that time.
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLike
They all look warm. Thanks for sharing. Warmest regards, Ed
LikeLiked by 1 person
I imagine they were sweltering under all those clothes, Ed.
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Not as much as you think since the fabrics were natural fabrics and breathable. Middle class and upper class ladies’ blouses would have been made of very fine cotton.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Reblogged this on When Angels Fly.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you very much for doing that.
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person
In 1906, they were dressed to the nines.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Nicely done as always, David.
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Not just this sequence of photos but I always think about the individuals and how their live’s panned out, who survived WWI and WWII who may have still been alive when I was born in the 50’s and the changes they had seen, great photos Pete thanks
LikeLiked by 2 people
I also imagine all that from a face in a photo, Bobby. Great minds think alike mate.
Cheers, Pete.
LikeLike
Life was certainly different back then, wasn’t it Pete? It is amazing to see what was considered acceptable fashion back in those days.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Elegance and modesty was the order of the day, Bruce. Not much wrong with that, on reflection.
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Not that I would care to wear those clothes, but I always feel they are very elegant and show off a woman’s attributes. Back then,methinks ladies were more slender of body. Or maybe it was all those corsets!
LikeLiked by 2 people
The corsets helped, but I think most people -women and men- were much slimmer. They walked more, and ate less than we do now.
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person
What lovely modest clothing – not a cleavage in sight. None of them were fat either.
LikeLiked by 1 person
So few people were fat, until after WW2.
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person
They are all very elegantly turned out–and the hats!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Hats were considered essential for both men and women then, Liz. Even the poorest people would always wear a hat.
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I rather like those styles and in the early seventies ( at least in Australia ) there was a brief fad for maxis and as I did dressmaking I made myself some long flowing dresses. They were nice and cool in summer – but of course I did not have on all the corsets and undergarments! Early settlers in Australia wore all the layers of clothing they were used to in Britain.
LikeLiked by 3 people
My first wife wore Laura Ashley ‘maxi’ dresses in the 1970s. 🙂
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person
We had a similar fad here as well, maxi skirt, belted, with a high collared white blouse, usually with lots of lace or tucking. And, of course, there were always boots!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks for adding your memories, Dorothy.
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Not an ounce of spare flesh on the ladies, with their cinched-in waists! It’s possibly surprising that more people didn’t notice the photographer, as it was quite unusual then. Cheers, Jon.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Perhaps they were far too well-mannered to glance at him? 🙂
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Could be—or otherwise engaged 😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
They probably agreed to pose for him!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Amazing captures
LikeLiked by 2 people
He did very well, considering the cameras available at the time.
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 2 people
They had to to make sure the men had no bad ideas cos they weren’t on the pill in those days.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I am sure those ladies all waited until they were married, Gavin. 🙂
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vaginal_syringe
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLike
Gulp, well I have learnt something!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well I thought I knew pretty much all the historical contraceptives- but had never heard of those before! Yikes, quite nasty. Some of that must’ve burned and caused inflammation, and soreness.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Very unpleasant, I’m sure.
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLike